ZERO BALANCE REVIEW
Why leave millions on the table?
With rising expenses, staffing shortages and a rapidly changing payer market, there's little time for evaluating the precision of revenue cycle processes and payments.
WHY CHANGE?
Instead of focusing on reducing expenses, find a new source of revenue in a risk-free contingency model, with a seamless transition and low burden on your teams.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42bb0/42bb0b4e1a1d774bd59581bcf72d4c290a34d9f1" alt="Vector image with 3 people in front of oversized monitor with bar graphic and pie chart. Man is cheering. Woman is climbing steps of bar chart to put coin in top bar. Another man is watering piggy bank."
ZERO BALANCE REVIEW
Look to Salud when:
-
You want to boost collections and improve your financial health
​​
-
You want to identify billing and coding issues not apparent in denials
​​
-
You want to enhance payer relations and accountability
​​
-
You want to focus on INTEGRITY and minimize compliance risk
Specialized expertise:
-
Advanced analytics compare reimbursements with payer contracts and policies
-
Proprietary automated claims scrubber flags incorrect claims, denials and underpayments
-
Unparalleled advice enhances our clients' success in reducing future revenue leakage
-
PHI treated with the utmost care; SOC2 compliant and recurrent HIPAA compliance training
discovered
$10.6M
in revenue leakage
for 3-hospital integrated delivery system
collected over
$3M
in six months
for 9-hospital regional health system
SALUD AT WORK
Early success drive expansion of zero balance reviews
Challenge
What started as a modest review of settled claims within a 10-hospital health system gained traction quickly, especially after Salud was able to recover $10 million in the first year for the system. The system is part of a statewide purchasing consortium.
​
Solution
Salud’s payment models include reimbursement calculators designed to ensure complete account payment for services performed, not just what was billed. As each system hospital was added, a review of coding, billing and write-offs fixed a host of broken processes.
​
Results
-
$43 million in underpayments identified
-
$26 million appealed
-
$21 million recovered
IN UNDERPAYMENTS IDENTIFIED
$43M
APPEALED
$26M
RECOVERED
$21M